Is Hino truck durability a common concern for customers considering investing in commercial vehicles? Hino, alongside Isuzu, is a renowned Japanese truck brand known for its quality and robust construction. This article provides a detailed comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of both brands, focusing primarily on Hino’s durability, to assist you in making an informed decision.
Various Isuzu truck models showcasing different sizes and load capacities.
Hino Truck Investment Costs: A Comparison
Both Hino and Isuzu are positioned in the premium truck segment in Vietnam, reflecting their relatively higher prices. The choice between them often depends on financial resources and specific operational needs.
For businesses with stable freight volumes, long-haul routes, and a requirement for powerful, durable, and reliable trucks with minimal breakdowns, Hino and Isuzu are ideal choices. Conversely, startups or businesses with limited capital may consider Vietnamese or Chinese truck brands that offer more affordable options.
Within the heavy-duty segment (8-15 tons), Hino tends to be priced 20-40 million VND lower than Isuzu. However, in the medium-duty segment (5-6.5 tons), Isuzu is typically 20-30 million VND more expensive than Hino. For light-duty trucks, Isuzu generally offers a more price-competitive advantage over Hino.
Both brands maintain good resale value, experience fewer breakdowns, and are supported by nationwide official warranty and maintenance services. However, replacement parts can be costly and often require ordering directly from the factory.
A Hino 5-ton truck with a closed cargo box, parked outdoors.
Engine Performance and Fuel Efficiency: Hino vs Isuzu
Isuzu adopted electronic engines three years prior to Hino, focusing on fuel-efficient designs. For example, in the 8-ton segment, Isuzu consumes approximately 14 liters per 100km, while Hino consumes around 16 liters per 100km.
However, within the same 8-ton category, Hino boasts a more powerful engine (260ps, 2500 rpm) compared to Isuzu (240ps, 2600 rpm).
Therefore, Isuzu is well-suited for long-distance freight transport, prioritizing fuel economy. Hino, on the other hand, excels in power and is better suited for challenging terrains like hills and mountains. The optimal choice depends on the specific characteristics of the transportation routes.
Close-up view of a Hino truck engine, showcasing its robust components and design.
Exterior and Interior Design Features
Both Hino and Isuzu present robust, modern, and refined designs. The Hino cabin chassis sits 3-5 centimeters lower than Isuzu’s, which can make Isuzu cabins appear more spacious and airy.
However, Hino offers several notable advantages. In the heavy-duty segment, Hino trucks are equipped with air suspension seats and a sleeper berth for drivers, features not yet commonly found in Isuzu models.
Regarding tires, both brands utilize Brightone tires, but Hino employs 11.R20 tires in its heavy-duty segment, while Isuzu typically uses 10.R20. This indicates that Hino offers superior load-bearing capacity and resilience.
The Hino chassis is constructed from high-grade alloy, making it thicker and more robust than Isuzu’s by approximately 5 centimeters, effectively catering to the demands of overloading.
An Isuzu 8-ton truck with a long cargo bed, parked on a paved surface.
A Hino 8-ton truck with a long cargo bed, parked next to another truck.
Conclusion: Hino Truck Durability – Are They Built to Last?
Through this comparison, Isuzu emerges as a suitable choice for transporting lighter loads in urban environments and on flat terrain. Hino, with its sturdy chassis and powerful engine, effectively meets the demands of overloading and challenging terrains, affirming its superior durability. Ultimately, the selection hinges on specific operational needs and conditions.
